🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win overall, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner gained half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year went for Zohran now. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I wish he does so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. So there was some opposition. But no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if existed major surprises on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.