🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like it requires a PhD in healthcare.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Expensive

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning due to political disagreements over subsidies that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee making average wages pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare that with what average US resident spends. I know multiple businesses that are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When including those costs versus our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like many our government's defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding about benefits among workers – contrasted with the current system where they have to decipher the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to major studies. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.